Written by Georgie Sutton.
Jim Wallis is somewhat of an evangelical Christian social justice stalwart. As such, he’s a bit of a hero of mine! This article (link to Wallis’ blog) has been written in response to calls in the U.S. for Bush-era legislation allowing “discriminative” employment by religious organisations to be overturned. The question was posed in the Washington Post: “Should religious charities that receive federal grant money be allowed to discriminate in hiring?”
Such concerns have also been raised recently in Australia, under such front-page headlines as “Government bows to religious right“, reporting on the alleged discrimination of religious groups in who they choose to employ as well as in who qualifies for their services.
Wallis makes the point in his piece that there is a marked difference between these two categories. He argues that an organisation ought to have the right to protect its identity by hiring those who share this identity. For instance, a Christian aid organisation, in order to maintain its identity as Christian, should be allowed to employ Christians. To be compelled to employ people who do not share their beliefs would undermine the integrity of that organisation as “Christian”. By employing Christian workers, an organisation can maintain its mission, purpose and values.
The second issue – of discrimination of service – is a different one altogether, Wallis argues (and I would agree). To limit the provision of Christian services to those who share Christian beliefs is internally focused, and not at all representative of the compassion and love the organisation stands to represent. If the organisation was receiving government funding as well (as far as I know, this would be uncommon in Australia, but sounds to be widespread in the States) then this is even more important, as government services ought not be tied only to those of a certain religion.
For me, Wallis hits the nail on the head. Unless we recognise the needy in every colour and creed we are not being true to God’s call to love all of his children. It’s fine to want to protect the identity of an organisation, and a Christian charity ought to be free to share their Christ-centred and biblical reasons for doing what they do. But to limit the reach of the charity to within those who already know God would be an insufficient demonstration of the big love of our great God.








Recent Comments